Update: MDP has clarified that Ms Tan Beng Chiak has “signed a version of the NDA, as she is an active member of one of our workgroups which involves discussions around business-sensitive information”. It adds that construction for the Banyan Tree Resort has not begun and additional surveys are under way. This article has been amended to reflect these changes.
If Singapore’s wildlife had a superhero, it would be Subaraj Rajathurai.
He doesn’t wear a cape or a suit, but a polo tee and loose cargo pants that offer comfort in the heat and humidity of Singapore’s wilderness.
As the country moves into a new phase of massive urban development, the 54-year-old naturalist has been one of the most active in ensuring their survival against the onslaught of man and machine. For the last 36 years, he has been advocating for the increased protection of Singapore’s native flora and fauna, whose homes in the tropical forests are increasingly encroached upon by concrete jungles.
The battle to protect Singapore’s wildlife has typically involved Subaraj and many other nature experts and groups. But this time, Subaraj has decided to leave nature’s “Avengers” and continue the fight on his own,
“My loyalty has always been to nature and the wildlife, not any organisation. Not even the Nature Society (Singapore),” is a line that he tells me more than once.
The naturalist is hugely concerned about the spate of roadkill incidents involving at least five native mammals in the surrounding area of MPD’s worksite, which borders the Central Catchment Nature Reserve, the largest nature reserve in Singapore. In June, a sambar deer and wild boar were killed at the Mandai Road exit of the Bukit Timah Road Expressway (BKE).
Subaraj claims that MPD did not take adequate measures to prevent animals from getting onto the roads. For instance, he says there are still gaps in the holding surrounding the area that allows the animals to bypass. Different types of fencing used on both sides of Mandai Lake Road also means that the animals crossing the road will inevitably be trapped as they cannot get to safety on the other side.
So any animal that gets onto the road is simply waiting to be killed.
“It’s stupidity beyond belief, and it needs to be resolved as soon as possible,” says Subaraj. He believes signing the NDA would bar him from being a voice for the wildlife and raising these issues in the press. “Not signing it may not be the popular decision, but it is the right thing to do.”
In an email interview, Dr Lee Hui Mien, vice-president of sustainable solutions at MPD, says that the developer will continue to engage Subaraj in “events and discussions where there is no business-sensitive information being shared”, such as attraction designs, due to commercial obligations to other stakeholders involved.
She adds that the nature community are free to share their views on the Mandai project.
“The zoo director called me in for a meeting and said that the NDA doesn’t mean I can’t talk to the press. But who decides? Once I say something wrong, I would be taken to court,” says Subaraj. “There’s so much going on that is wrong, why give up all your control and freedom to speak to the NDA? So now I’m free to say what I want to say, as long as it’s facts.”
Even when he’s visibly perturbed by the Mandai situation, Subaraj never loses his cool. He explains the details in a calming voice reminiscent of a Singaporean hybrid of Ian Mckellen and David Attenborough, perfect for a documentary or audiobook.
“When we have a dialogue with developers and the government, our arguments must always be based on facts. In the past, people got too emotional and that’s how they played into the government’s hands. Even if you’re very passionate about nature and want to do good to save it, you must come up with the facts. Then the authorities are more willing to listen.”
This only started to change in the late ‘80s, beginning with the preservation of the Sungei Buloh wetlands, which had been slated for agrotechnology development. Subaraj was part of the four-man team which championed for the creation of a nature reserve. While only 87 hectares of the area was ultimately saved from redevelopment – much smaller than the 318ha proposed – it was already an achievement. Back then, changing the minds of a government indifferent towards nature was an almost insurmountable challenge.
With that, the environmentalism movement gained momentum. In 1992, Subaraj and his peers from the Nature Society succeeded in halting the clearing of an area of protected forest at Lower Pierce Reservoir for a golf course. Having stirred up so much controversy in the press must have riled a few feathers too, as Subaraj reveals that one of their offices had been raided during that period. “We probably have huge files with the Internal Security Department,” he half-jokes. “But I’ve never been affiliated with anybody, so I don’t fear even if I get investigated.”
Professor Wee Yeow Chin, then president of the Nature Society, writes in a 2017 post on the Bird Ecology Study Group blog that Lower Pierce Reservoir and Sungei Buloh remain “the only two successes that the society can be proud of” today.
He insists the environmental impact assessment (EIA), which was conducted by environmental consultancy firm ERM, was not thorough and accurate. According to the naturalist, who runs his own company Strix Wildlife Consultancy, the site for the Banyan Tree resort was not properly studied. (Rice understands from MDP that additional surveys at the site are currently underway.)
He adds that the resort is also not eco-friendly even if it was designed specifically with that objective in mind. “It’s a resort in the middle of a forest. At night you may have frogs jump into the swimming pool full of chlorine and die, the pool becomes a death trap. Then you may build the resort on the edge of the reservoir because you want a scenic view, but the lights will affect the nature reserve.
“Being eco-friendly is not just about the types of services on offer at the resort. These are things that you need to consider as priorities rather than costs and profit.”
“What are we waiting for, a human fatality when a car hits a sambar deer or wild boar? Address the problem with quick solutions like barriers, fences, and closure of gaps to prevent the animals from getting onto the road. It’s good for the wildlife and the public, a win-win outcome.”
NUS professor Peter Ng, chairman of the EAP, tells me in a separate interview he agrees with Subaraj’s assessment that current measures are not perfect and more needs to be done. But he also says that even if Mandai may be taking its time to consult with its partners, it is still receptive to their suggestions.
For instance, the EAP successfully convinced Mandai to install rope bridges to help arboreal animals cross the road, even though they could very likely be underutilised. But Prof Ng stresses that “blanket measures” are not the solution.
These walks are also an opportunity for Subaraj to inspire children, who will form the next generation of naturalists and environmentalists. While the self-taught naturalist didn’t go to university and learnt everything on his own by being in the wilderness from a tender age of 18, students today have so much information at their disposal. That only bodes well for the future of Singapore’s wildlife – if the next generation takes up the mantle first.
I had been looking forward to being enlightened by Subaraj on a short trek through a nature reserve. Unfortunately, on this occasion, he apologises for turning down my request. He had just been hospitalised before we met last week, and the doctor had advised him to avoid physical exertion.
As we walk around the field at Pasir Ris Park for a brief photoshoot, I can already see signs of Subaraj’s declining fitness. He can’t move with ease and speed, and has to take small gentle steps. He also pants quite heavily while we chat on the move, as though we had just climbed up a small hill when in reality, it’s only been two minutes on flat ground in relatively cool weather.
“We (the current batch of naturalists) are all getting on in our years, some of us less healthy than others. SG100 is all about the younger generation, not me – I won’t be around by then. There are many youngsters taking part in forums, seminars and nature walks, and they do these really well. But most of them are still hesitant to talk to ministers and decision-makers. We need more of them to step up.”
Are you a nature lover? Do you find driving along Mandai dangerous due to the presence of wildlife? Write to the author at firstname.lastname@example.org